Who we serve/Corporates/Engineering & Construction

Every project cost follows the job. Except this one.

EPC and infrastructure firms reconcile every rupee of project cost to the right entity, steel, cement, labour, all of it. Travel GST is the line that doesn't, stranding credit in the seam between parent and SPV.

Site mobilisationwaves of travel as jobs ramp
Project entities & JVsone structure per major job
State GSTINsregistrations wherever work happens
Your travel reality

Why EPC loses travel GST.

Because project structures multiply the ways a filing can land wrong, and mobilisation leaves no time to notice.

01

Every project is its own company

SPVs, JVs, consortiums, travel for a job should bill to that job's entity. In practice, bookings run through whoever's fastest, and the paperwork follows the wrong path from the first ticket.

02

Mobilisation waves swamp process

When a site ramps up, dozens travel in weeks. Documentation discipline is the first casualty of a mobilisation push, and no one goes back to fix the paper after the pour.

03

Credit strands in the seam

GST filed to the parent when the SPV travelled, or the reverse, is credit neither entity can cleanly claim. It sits in the structural seam, invisible to both sides' reports.

The shape of the leak

Credit, stuck between your own companies.

One highway project. Travel booked through the parent; the job, and the claimable credit, belongs to the SPV. Watch what's sitting in the seam, and where it should go.

NH-847 Expressway · one mobilisation quarter 3 filings in the seam
Parent Co.Booked the travel · default GSTIN
Fastest booking path for a site in a hurry, so the filings landed here. But this entity didn't do the job.
₹0claimable here
The seam
₹9,410Mobilisation flightsfiled to parent · job is SPV's
₹4,730Engineer rotationsfiled to parent · job is SPV's
₹7,260Consultant visitsfiled to parent · job is SPV's
NH-847 SPVDid the job · should hold the credit
The project entity whose 2B should carry this travel, and where the credit becomes claimable against the job.
₹0recovered to the job
We reconcile entity-to-entityfinding what's stranded in the seam and carrying it to the registration that owns the work.
Illustrative project, shown to explain the pattern, not client data.
How TraCarta fits

Project discipline, applied to travel GST.

You already reconcile every rupee of project cost to the right job. Travel GST deserves the same disciplineand rarely gets it.

Suggested planMax or Max+project entities and JVs suit full management.
  • Project-entity mapping. Each invoice reconciled to the correct SPV, JV or registration, so credit follows the job, the way every other cost on the project does.
  • Mobilisation-proof. The engine doesn't care that fifty people flew in a fortnight. Every ticket in the wave gets matched, during the push, not after the paper's gone cold.
  • Cross-entity gaps recovered. Wrong-entity filings identified, valued per project, and, with Max+, chased back to the airlines for correction and refiling.

On a project P&L measured to the last rupee, credit stranded between your own entities is the strangest loss of allreal money, lost to nobody but the seam.

Check the seam on one live project.

Book a free reconciliation review, one mobilisation quarter usually tells the story.